Engineered Self-Organization for Resilient Robot Self-Assembly with Minimal Surprise
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In collective robotic systems, the automatic generation of controllers for complex tasks is still a challenging problem. Open-ended evolution of complex robot behaviors can be a possible solution whereby an intrinsic driver for pattern formation and self-organization may prove to be important. We implement such a driver in collective robot systems by evolving prediction networks as world models in pair with action-selection networks. Fitness is given for good predictions which causes a bias towards easily predictable environments and behaviors in the form of emergent patterns, that is, environments of minimal surprise. There is no task-dependent bias or any other explicit predetermination for the different qualities of the emerging patterns. A careful configuration of actions, sensor models, and the environment is required to stimulate the emergence of complex behaviors. We study self-assembly to increase the scenario's complexity for our minimal surprise approach and, at the same time, limit the complexity of our simulations to a grid world to manage the feasibility of this approach. We investigate the impact of different swarm densities and the shape of the environment on the emergent patterns. Furthermore, we study how evolution can be biased towards the emergence of desired patterns. We analyze the resilience of the resulting self-assembly behaviors by causing damages to the assembled pattern and observe the self-organized reassembly of the structure. In summary, we evolved swarm behaviors for resilient self-assembly and successfully engineered self-organization in simulation. In future work, we plan to transfer our approach to a swarm of real robots.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Learning to Imitate Spatial Organization in Multi-robot Systems
- 2026Co-Evolution in Agentic Systems: Toward Self-Directed Evolution Beyond Human Design
- 2026Waggle: Learning One Anonymous Local Law for Self-Organizing LLM Swarms
- 2026Drop the Hierarchy and Roles: How Self-Organizing LLM Agents Outperform Designed Structures
- 2026How Swarms Differ: Challenges in Collective Behaviour Comparison
- 2026When Multi-Robot Systems Meet Agentic AI:Towards Embodied Collective Intelligence
- 2025Collective Behavior Clone with Visual Attention via Neural Interaction Graph Prediction
- 2026Width, Memory, and Delay: A Resource Accounting for the Limits of Flat Multi-Agent Systems