Daedalus: Breaking Non-Maximum Suppression in Object Detection via Adversarial Examples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper demonstrates that Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS), which is commonly used in Object Detection (OD) tasks to filter redundant detection results, is no longer secure. Considering that NMS has been an integral part of OD systems, thwarting the functionality of NMS can result in unexpected or even lethal consequences for such systems. In this paper, an adversarial example attack which triggers malfunctioning of NMS in end-to-end OD models is proposed. The attack, namely textttDaedalus, compresses the dimensions of detection boxes to evade NMS. As a result, the final detection output contains extremely dense false positives. This can be fatal for many OD applications such as autonomous vehicles and surveillance systems. The attack can be generalised to different end-to-end OD models, such that the attack cripples various OD applications. Furthermore, a way to craft robust adversarial examples is developed by using an ensemble of popular detection models as the substitutes. Considering the pervasive nature of model reusing in real-world OD scenarios, Daedalus examples crafted based on an textitensemble of substitutes can launch attacks without knowing the parameters of the victim models. Experimental results demonstrate that the attack effectively stops NMS from filtering redundant bounding boxes. As the evaluation results suggest, Daedalus increases the false positive rate in detection results to 99.9% and reduces the mean average precision scores to 0, while maintaining a low cost of distortion on the original inputs. It is also demonstrated that the attack can be practically launched against real-world OD systems via printed posters.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2021DetectorGuard: Provably Securing Object Detectors against Localized Patch Hiding Attackscited by 28
- 2021Demystifying the Transferability of Adversarial Attacks in Computer Networkscited by 9
- 2021Adversarial Learning with Cost-Sensitive Classescited by 6
- 2022Physical Passive Patch Adversarial Attacks on Visual Odometry Systemscited by 6
- 2022Is Neuron Coverage Needed to Make Person Detection More Robust?cited by 1
- 2022Focused Adversarial Attackscited by 1
- 2023Towards Generic and Controllable Attacks Against Object Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Physical Adversarial Attacks on AI Surveillance Systems:Detection, Tracking, and Visible--Infrared Evasioncited by 0
- 2026Physical Adversarial Attacks on AI Surveillance Systems:Detection, Tracking, and Visible--Infrared Evasion8 Apr 2026
- 2023Towards Generic and Controllable Attacks Against Object Detection23 Jul 2023
- 2022Physical Passive Patch Adversarial Attacks on Visual Odometry Systems11 Jul 2022
- 2022Focused Adversarial Attacks19 May 2022
- 2022Is Neuron Coverage Needed to Make Person Detection More Robust?21 Apr 2022
- 2021Demystifying the Transferability of Adversarial Attacks in Computer Networks9 Oct 2021
- 2021DetectorGuard: Provably Securing Object Detectors against Localized Patch Hiding Attacks5 Feb 2021
- 2021Adversarial Learning with Cost-Sensitive Classes29 Jan 2021