mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Is CQT more suitable for monaural speech separation than STFT? an empirical study

arXiv 1902.00631 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2019cs.SD eess.AScited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Short-time Fourier transform (STFT) is used as the front end of many popular successful monaural speech separation methods, such as deep clustering (DPCL), permutation invariant training (PIT) and their various variants. Since the frequency component of STFT is linear, while the frequency distribution of human auditory system is nonlinear. In this work we propose and give an empirical study to use an alternative front end called constant Q transform (CQT) instead of STFT to achieve a better simulation of the frequency resolving power of the human auditory system. The upper bound in signal-to-distortion (SDR) of ideal speech separation based on CQT's ideal ration mask (IRM) is higher than that based on STFT. In the same experimental setting on WSJ0-2mix corpus, we examined the performance of CQT under different backends, including the original DPCL, utterance level PIT, and some of their variants. It is found that all CQT-based methods are better than STFT-based methods, and achieved on average 0.4dB better performance than STFT based method in SDR improvements.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.