Stochastic Recursive Variance-Reduced Cubic Regularization Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Stochastic Variance-Reduced Cubic regularization (SVRC) algorithms have received increasing attention due to its improved gradient/Hessian complexities (i.e., number of queries to stochastic gradient/Hessian oracles) to find local minima for nonconvex finite-sum optimization. However, it is unclear whether existing SVRC algorithms can be further improved. Moreover, the semi-stochastic Hessian estimator adopted in existing SVRC algorithms prevents the use of Hessian-vector product-based fast cubic subproblem solvers, which makes SVRC algorithms computationally intractable for high-dimensional problems. In this paper, we first present a Stochastic Recursive Variance-Reduced Cubic regularization method (SRVRC) using a recursively updated semi-stochastic gradient and Hessian estimators. It enjoys improved gradient and Hessian complexities to find an (ε, √ε)-approximate local minimum, and outperforms the state-of-the-art SVRC algorithms. Built upon SRVRC, we further propose a Hessian-free SRVRC algorithm, namely SRVRCfree, which only requires stochastic gradient and Hessian-vector product computations, and achieves tilde O(dnε-2 land dε-3) runtime complexity, where n is the number of component functions in the finite-sum structure, d is the problem dimension, and ε is the optimization precision. This outperforms the best-known runtime complexity tilde O(dε-3.5) achieved by stochastic cubic regularization algorithm proposed in Tripuraneni et al. 2018.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
12 papers.
- 2022Stochastic Second-Order Methods Improve Best-Known Sample Complexity of SGD for Gradient-Dominated Functioncited by 19
- 2024Revisiting Gradient Normalization and Clipping for Nonconvex SGD under Heavy-Tailed Noise: Necessity, Sufficiency, and Accelerationcited by 18
- 2023How to escape sharp minima with random perturbationscited by 13
- 2021Escape saddle points by a simple gradient-descent based algorithmcited by 11
- 2021On the Oracle Complexity of Higher-Order Smooth Non-Convex Finite-Sum Optimizationcited by 1
- 2021Escaping Saddle Points with Compressed SGDcited by 1
- 2023Efficiently Escaping Saddle Points for Policy Optimizationcited by 1
- 2024Noise is All You Need: Private Second-Order Convergence of Noisy SGDcited by 1
- 2026AdaCubic: An Adaptive Cubic Regularization Optimizer for Deep Learningcited by 1
- 2022HOUDINI: Escaping from Moderately Constrained Saddlescited by 0
- 2023Faster Riemannian Newton-type Optimization by Subsampling and Cubic Regularizationcited by 0
- 2026Sharp First-Order Lower Bounds for Higher-Order Smooth Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Sharp First-Order Lower Bounds for Higher-Order Smooth Nonconvex Optimization3 Jun 2026
- 2026AdaCubic: An Adaptive Cubic Regularization Optimizer for Deep Learning10 Apr 2026
- 2024Revisiting Gradient Normalization and Clipping for Nonconvex SGD under Heavy-Tailed Noise: Necessity, Sufficiency, and Acceleration21 Oct 2024
- 2024Noise is All You Need: Private Second-Order Convergence of Noisy SGD9 Oct 2024
- 2023Efficiently Escaping Saddle Points for Policy Optimization15 Nov 2023
- 2023How to escape sharp minima with random perturbations25 May 2023
- 2023Faster Riemannian Newton-type Optimization by Subsampling and Cubic Regularization22 Feb 2023
- 2022HOUDINI: Escaping from Moderately Constrained Saddles27 May 2022
- 2022Stochastic Second-Order Methods Improve Best-Known Sample Complexity of SGD for Gradient-Dominated Function25 May 2022
- 2021Escape saddle points by a simple gradient-descent based algorithm28 Nov 2021
- 2021Escaping Saddle Points with Compressed SGD21 May 2021
- 2021On the Oracle Complexity of Higher-Order Smooth Non-Convex Finite-Sum Optimization8 Mar 2021