Generalization of Spoofing Countermeasures: a Case Study with ASVspoof 2015 and BTAS 2016 Corpora
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Voice-based biometric systems are highly prone to spoofing attacks. Recently, various countermeasures have been developed for detecting different kinds of attacks such as replay, speech synthesis (SS) and voice conversion (VC). Most of the existing studies are conducted with a specific training set defined by the evaluation protocol. However, for realistic scenarios, selecting appropriate training data is an open challenge for the system administrator. Motivated by this practical concern, this work investigates the generalization capability of spoofing countermeasures in restricted training conditions where speech from a broad attack types are left out in the training database. We demonstrate that different spoofing types have considerably different generalization capabilities. For this study, we analyze the performance using two kinds of features, mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) which are considered as baseline and recently proposed constant Q cepstral coefficients (CQCCs). The experiments are conducted with standard Gaussian mixture model - maximum likelihood (GMM-ML) classifier on two recently released spoofing corpora: ASVspoof 2015 and BTAS 2016 that includes cross-corpora performance analysis. Feature-level analysis suggests that static and dynamic coefficients of spectral features, both are important for detecting spoofing attacks in the real-life condition.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2023Multi-Dataset Co-Training with Sharpness-Aware Optimization for Audio Anti-spoofingcited by 9
- 2021Data Quality as Predictor of Voice Anti-Spoofing Generalizationcited by 6
- 2023Collaborative Watermarking for Adversarial Speech Synthesiscited by 6
- 2023Cross-Corpora Spoken Language Identification with Domain Diversification and Generalizationcited by 3
- 2024Audio Codec Augmentation for Robust Collaborative Watermarking of Speech Synthesiscited by 3
- 2022An Overview of Indian Spoken Language Recognition from Machine Learning Perspectivecited by 2
- 2024Beyond Silence: Bias Analysis through Loss and Asymmetric Approach in Audio Anti-Spoofingcited by 2
- 2025FADEL: Uncertainty-aware Fake Audio Detection with Evidential Deep Learningcited by 1
- 2026What Survives the Codec Shift: Pooled No-Vocals Residuals for Speech Deepfake Detectioncited by 0
- 2026What Survives the Codec Shift: Pooled No-Vocals Residuals for Speech Deepfake Detection27 Sep 2026
- 2025FADEL: Uncertainty-aware Fake Audio Detection with Evidential Deep Learning22 Apr 2025
- 2024Audio Codec Augmentation for Robust Collaborative Watermarking of Speech Synthesis20 Sep 2024
- 2024Beyond Silence: Bias Analysis through Loss and Asymmetric Approach in Audio Anti-Spoofing25 Jun 2024
- 2023Collaborative Watermarking for Adversarial Speech Synthesis26 Sep 2023
- 2023Multi-Dataset Co-Training with Sharpness-Aware Optimization for Audio Anti-spoofing31 May 2023
- 2023Cross-Corpora Spoken Language Identification with Domain Diversification and Generalization10 Feb 2023
- 2022An Overview of Indian Spoken Language Recognition from Machine Learning Perspective30 Nov 2022
- 2021Data Quality as Predictor of Voice Anti-Spoofing Generalization26 Mar 2021