Second Order Statistics Analysis and Comparison between Arithmetic and Geometric Average Fusion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Two fundamental approaches to information averaging are based on linear and logarithmic combination, yielding the arithmetic average (AA) and geometric average (GA) of the fusing initials, respectively. In the context of target tracking, the two most common formats of data to be fused are random variables and probability density functions, namely v-fusion and f-fusion, respectively. In this work, we analyze and compare the second order statistics (including variance and mean square error) of AA and GA in terms of both v-fusion and f-fusion. The case of weighted Gaussian mixtures representing multitarget densities in the presence of false alarms and misdetection (whose weight sums are not necessarily unit) is also considered, the result of which appears significantly different from that for a single target. In addition to exact derivation, exemplifying analysis and illustrations are provided.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Bayesian data fusion with shared priorscited by 3
- 2024A Gaussian Process-based Streaming Algorithm for Prediction of Time Series With Regimes and Outlierscited by 2
- 2023Policy Evaluation in Decentralized POMDPs with Belief Sharingcited by 1
- 2023On the Fusion Strategies for Federated Decision Makingcited by 1
- 2024A Gaussian Process-based Streaming Algorithm for Prediction of Time Series With Regimes and Outliers1 Jun 2024
- 2023On the Fusion Strategies for Federated Decision Making10 Mar 2023
- 2023Policy Evaluation in Decentralized POMDPs with Belief Sharing8 Feb 2023
- 2022Bayesian data fusion with shared priors14 Dec 2022