Mathematical model of gender bias and homophily in professional hierarchies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Women have become better represented in business, academia, and government over time, yet a dearth of women at the highest levels of leadership remains. Sociologists have attributed the leaky progression of women through professional hierarchies to various cultural and psychological factors, such as self-segregation and bias. Here, we present a minimal mathematical model that reveals the relative role that bias and homophily (self-seeking) may play in the ascension of women through professional hierarchies. Unlike previous models, our novel model predicts that gender parity is not inevitable, and deliberate intervention may be required to achieve gender balance in several fields. To validate the model, we analyze a new database of gender fractionation over time for 16 professional hierarchies. We quantify the degree of homophily and bias in each professional hierarchy, and we propose specific interventions to achieve gender parity more quickly.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022FairEGM: Fair Link Prediction and Recommendation via Emulated Graph Modificationcited by 15
- 2024Promoting Fairness in Link Prediction with Graph Enhancementcited by 6
- 2022Minorities in networks and algorithmscited by 0
- 2025On Mitigating Affinity Bias through Bandits with Evolving Biased Feedbackcited by 0
- 2025On Mitigating Affinity Bias through Bandits with Evolving Biased Feedback7 Mar 2025
- 2024Promoting Fairness in Link Prediction with Graph Enhancement13 Sep 2024
- 2022Minorities in networks and algorithms14 Jun 2022
- 2022FairEGM: Fair Link Prediction and Recommendation via Emulated Graph Modification27 Jan 2022