The information-theoretic value of unlabeled data in semi-supervised learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We quantify the separation between the numbers of labeled examples required to learn in two settings: Settings with and without the knowledge of the distribution of the unlabeled data. More specifically, we prove a separation by Theta(log n) multiplicative factor for the class of projections over the Boolean hypercube of dimension n. We prove that there is no separation for the class of all functions on domain of any size. Learning with the knowledge of the distribution (a.k.a. fixed-distribution learning) can be viewed as an idealized scenario of semi-supervised learning where the number of unlabeled data points is so great that the unlabeled distribution is known exactly. For this reason, we call the separation the value of unlabeled data.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022Class-Imbalanced Complementary-Label Learning via Weighted Losscited by 7
- 2023Meta Co-Training: Two Views are Better than Onecited by 5
- 2025TRiCo: Triadic Game-Theoretic Co-Training for Robust Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 4
- 2023Learning from Stochastic Labelscited by 0
- 2026Relatively Smart: A New Approach for Instance-Optimal Learningcited by 0
- 2026Relatively Smart: A New Approach for Instance-Optimal Learning2 Mar 2026
- 2025TRiCo: Triadic Game-Theoretic Co-Training for Robust Semi-Supervised Learning25 Sep 2025
- 2023Meta Co-Training: Two Views are Better than One29 Nov 2023
- 2023Learning from Stochastic Labels1 Feb 2023
- 2022Class-Imbalanced Complementary-Label Learning via Weighted Loss28 Sep 2022