On (The Lack Of) Location Privacy in Crowdsourcing Applications
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Crowdsourcing enables application developers to benefit from large and diverse datasets at a low cost. Specifically, mobile crowdsourcing (MCS) leverages users' devices as sensors to perform geo-located data collection. The collection of geolocated data raises serious privacy concerns for users. Yet, despite the large research body on location privacy-preserving mechanisms (LPPMs), MCS developers implement little to no protection for data collection or publication. To understand this mismatch, we study the performance of existing LPPMs on publicly available data from two mobile crowdsourcing projects. Our results show that well-established defenses are either not applicable or offer little protection in the MCS setting. Additionally, they have a much stronger impact on applications' utility than foreseen in the literature. This is because existing LPPMs, designed with location-based services (LBSs) in mind, are optimized for utility functions based on users' locations, while MCS utility functions depend on the values (e.g., measurements) associated with those locations. We finally outline possible research avenues to facilitate the development of new location privacy solutions that fit the needs of MCS so that the increasing number of such applications do not jeopardize their users' privacy.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2.
3 papers.
- 2021Location Leakage in Federated Signal Mapscited by 2
- 2022Privacy-Utility Trades in Crowdsourced Signal Map Obfuscationcited by 2
- 2022A Unified Prediction Framework for Signal Mapscited by 0
- 2022A Unified Prediction Framework for Signal Maps8 Feb 2022
- 2022Privacy-Utility Trades in Crowdsourced Signal Map Obfuscation13 Jan 2022
- 2021Location Leakage in Federated Signal Maps7 Dec 2021