Many Independent Objective (MIO) Algorithm for Test Suite Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automatically generating test suites is intrinsically a multi-objective problem, as any of the testing targets (e.g, statements to execute or mutants to kill) is an objective on its own. Test suite generation has peculiarities that are quite different from other more regular optimisation problems. For example, given an existing test suite, one can add more tests to cover the remaining objectives. One would like the smallest number of small tests to cover as many objectives as possible, but that is a secondary goal compared to covering those targets in the first place. Furthermore, the amount of objectives in software testing can quickly become unmanageable, in the order of (tens/hundreds of) thousands, especially for system testing of industrial size systems. Traditional multi-objective optimisation algorithms can already start to struggle with just four or five objectives to optimize. To overcome these issues, different techniques have been proposed, like for example the Whole Test Suite (WTS) approach and the Many-Objective Sorting Algorithm (MOSA). However, those techniques might not scale well to very large numbers of objectives and limited search budgets (a typical case in system testing). In this paper, we propose a novel algorithm, called Many Independent Objective (MIO) algorithm. This algorithm is designed and tailored based on the specific properties of test suite generation. An empirical study, on a set of artificial and actual software, shows that the MIO algorithm can achieve higher coverage compared to WTS and MOSA, as it can better exploit the peculiarities of test suite generation.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2022CodeT: Code Generation with Generated Testscited by 369
- 2021Improving Test Case Generation for REST APIs Through Hierarchical Clusteringcited by 3
- 2024Semi-Instruct: Bridging Natural-Instruct and Self-Instruct for Code Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2024Automated Test-Case Generation for REST APIs Using Model Inference Search Heuristiccited by 0
- 2024Automated Test-Case Generation for REST APIs Using Model Inference Search Heuristic4 Dec 2024
- 2024Semi-Instruct: Bridging Natural-Instruct and Self-Instruct for Code Large Language Models1 Mar 2024
- 2022CodeT: Code Generation with Generated Tests21 Jul 2022
- 2021Improving Test Case Generation for REST APIs Through Hierarchical Clustering14 Sep 2021