mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding the (un)interpretability of natural image distributions using generative models

arXiv 1901.01499 ↗First posted 6 Jan 2019cs.LG cs.CV stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Probability density estimation is a classical and well studied problem, but standard density estimation methods have historically lacked the power to model complex and high-dimensional image distributions. More recent generative models leverage the power of neural networks to implicitly learn and represent probability models over complex images. We describe methods to extract explicit probability density estimates from GANs, and explore the properties of these image density functions. We perform sanity check experiments to provide evidence that these probabilities are reasonable. However, we also show that density functions of natural images are difficult to interpret and thus limited in use. We study reasons for this lack of interpretability, and show that we can get interpretability back by doing density estimation on latent representations of images.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.