A Unified Theory of Early Visual Representations from Retina to Cortex through Anatomically Constrained Deep CNNs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The visual system is hierarchically organized to process visual information in successive stages. Neural representations vary drastically across the first stages of visual processing: at the output of the retina, ganglion cell receptive fields (RFs) exhibit a clear antagonistic center-surround structure, whereas in the primary visual cortex, typical RFs are sharply tuned to a precise orientation. There is currently no unified theory explaining these differences in representations across layers. Here, using a deep convolutional neural network trained on image recognition as a model of the visual system, we show that such differences in representation can emerge as a direct consequence of different neural resource constraints on the retinal and cortical networks, and we find a single model from which both geometries spontaneously emerge at the appropriate stages of visual processing. The key constraint is a reduced number of neurons at the retinal output, consistent with the anatomy of the optic nerve as a stringent bottleneck. Second, we find that, for simple cortical networks, visual representations at the retinal output emerge as nonlinear and lossy feature detectors, whereas they emerge as linear and faithful encoders of the visual scene for more complex cortices. This result predicts that the retinas of small vertebrates should perform sophisticated nonlinear computations, extracting features directly relevant to behavior, whereas retinas of large animals such as primates should mostly encode the visual scene linearly and respond to a much broader range of stimuli. These predictions could reconcile the two seemingly incompatible views of the retina as either performing feature extraction or efficient coding of natural scenes, by suggesting that all vertebrates lie on a spectrum between these two objectives, depending on the degree of neural resources allocated to their visual system.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
- 2023End-to-end topographic networks as models of cortical map formation and human visual behaviour: moving beyond convolutionscited by 8
- 2023A Deep Learning-based in silico Framework for Optimization on Retinal Prosthetic Stimulationcited by 3
- 2024Deep Oscillatory Neural Networkcited by 3
- 2024Deep Continuous Networkscited by 2
- 2025Training Large Neural Networks With Low-Dimensional Error Feedbackcited by 2
- 2022Machine Learning Method for Functional Assessment of Retinal Modelscited by 1
- 2026Growing a Neural Network in Breadth, Depth, and Timecited by 0
- 2026The Computational Value of Sensory-Aligned Receptive Fields Depends on Neuronal Expressivitycited by 0
- 2026The Computational Value of Sensory-Aligned Receptive Fields Depends on Neuronal Expressivity22 Sep 2026
- 2026Growing a Neural Network in Breadth, Depth, and Time24 May 2026
- 2025Training Large Neural Networks With Low-Dimensional Error Feedback27 Feb 2025
- 2024Deep Oscillatory Neural Network6 May 2024
- 2024Deep Continuous Networks2 Feb 2024
- 2023End-to-end topographic networks as models of cortical map formation and human visual behaviour: moving beyond convolutions18 Aug 2023
- 2023A Deep Learning-based in silico Framework for Optimization on Retinal Prosthetic Stimulation7 Feb 2023
- 2022Machine Learning Method for Functional Assessment of Retinal Models5 Feb 2022
- 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reduction4 Mar 2021