Anomaly Detection in Networks with Application to Financial Transaction Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper is motivated by the task of detecting anomalies in networks of financial transactions, with accounts as nodes and a directed weighted edge between two nodes denoting a money transfer. The weight of the edge is the transaction amount. Examples of anomalies in networks include long paths of large transaction amounts, rings of large payments, and cliques of accounts. There are many methods available which detect such specific structures in networks. Here we introduce a method which is able to detect previously unspecified anomalies in networks. The method is based on a combination of features from network comparison and spectral analysis as well as local statistics, yielding 140 main features. We then use a simple feature sum method, as well as a random forest method, in order to classify nodes as normal or anomalous. We test the method first on synthetic networks which we generated, and second on a set of synthetic networks which were generated without the methods team having access to the ground truth. The first set of synthetic networks was split in a training set of 70 percent of the networks, and a test set of 30 percent of the networks. The resulting classifier was then applied to the second set of synthetic networks. We compare our method with Oddball, a widely used method for anomaly detection in networks, as well as to random classification. While Oddball outperforms random classification, both our feature sum method and our random forest method outperform Oddball. On the test set, the random forest outperforms feature sum, whereas on the second synthetic data set, initially feature sum tends to pick up more anomalies than random forest, with this behaviour reversing for lower-scoring anomalies. In all cases, the top 2 percent of flagged anomalies contained on average over 90 percent of the planted anomalies.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023GAD-NR: Graph Anomaly Detection via Neighborhood Reconstructioncited by 44
- 2021DIGRAC: Digraph Clustering Based on Flow Imbalancecited by 15
- 2023Topology-Agnostic Detection of Temporal Money Laundering Flows in Billion-Scale Transactionscited by 10
- 2023Finding Money Launderers Using Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networkscited by 5
- 2026LineMVGNN: Anti-Money Laundering with Line-Graph-Assisted Multi-View Graph Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2025A Multimodal Approach to SME Credit Scoring Integrating Transaction and Ownership Networkscited by 0
- 2026LineMVGNN: Anti-Money Laundering with Line-Graph-Assisted Multi-View Graph Neural Networks24 Mar 2026
- 2025A Multimodal Approach to SME Credit Scoring Integrating Transaction and Ownership Networks10 Oct 2025
- 2023Topology-Agnostic Detection of Temporal Money Laundering Flows in Billion-Scale Transactions24 Sep 2023
- 2023Finding Money Launderers Using Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks25 Jul 2023
- 2023GAD-NR: Graph Anomaly Detection via Neighborhood Reconstruction2 Jun 2023
- 2021DIGRAC: Digraph Clustering Based on Flow Imbalance9 Jun 2021