mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Fingerprint Presentation Attack Detection: Generalization and Efficiency

arXiv 1812.11574 ↗First posted 30 Dec 2018cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of fingerprint presentation attack detection (PAD) under unknown PA materials not seen during PAD training. A dataset of 5,743 bonafide and 4,912 PA images of 12 different materials is used to evaluate a state-of-the-art PAD, namely Fingerprint Spoof Buster. We utilize 3D t-SNE visualization and clustering of material characteristics to identify a representative set of PA materials that cover most of PA feature space. We observe that a set of six PA materials, namely Silicone, 2D Paper, Play Doh, Gelatin, Latex Body Paint and Monster Liquid Latex provide a good representative set that should be included in training to achieve generalization of PAD. We also propose an optimized Android app of Fingerprint Spoof Buster that can run on a commodity smartphone (Xiaomi Redmi Note 4) without a significant drop in PAD performance (from TDR = 95.7% to 95.3% @ FDR = 0.2%) which can make a PA prediction in less than 300ms.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2.

9 papers.