Noise Flooding for Detecting Audio Adversarial Examples Against Automatic Speech Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural models enjoy widespread use across a variety of tasks and have grown to become crucial components of many industrial systems. Despite their effectiveness and extensive popularity, they are not without their exploitable flaws. Initially applied to computer vision systems, the generation of adversarial examples is a process in which seemingly imperceptible perturbations are made to an image, with the purpose of inducing a deep learning based classifier to misclassify the image. Due to recent trends in speech processing, this has become a noticeable issue in speech recognition models. In late 2017, an attack was shown to be quite effective against the Speech Commands classification model. Limited-vocabulary speech classifiers, such as the Speech Commands model, are used quite frequently in a variety of applications, particularly in managing automated attendants in telephony contexts. As such, adversarial examples produced by this attack could have real-world consequences. While previous work in defending against these adversarial examples has investigated using audio preprocessing to reduce or distort adversarial noise, this work explores the idea of flooding particular frequency bands of an audio signal with random noise in order to detect adversarial examples. This technique of flooding, which does not require retraining or modifying the model, is inspired by work done in computer vision and builds on the idea that speech classifiers are relatively robust to natural noise. A combined defense incorporating 5 different frequency bands for flooding the signal with noise outperformed other existing defenses in the audio space, detecting adversarial examples with 91.8% precision and 93.5% recall.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Dec 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2024SpeechGuard: Exploring the Adversarial Robustness of Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 18
- 2021SoK: A Modularized Approach to Study the Security of Automatic Speech Recognition Systemscited by 4
- 2024Transferable Adversarial Attacks against ASRcited by 4
- 2022Adversarial Attacks on Speech Recognition Systems for Mission-Critical Applications: A Surveycited by 3
- 2023DistriBlock: Identifying adversarial audio samples by leveraging characteristics of the output distributioncited by 3
- 2022Mel Frequency Spectral Domain Defenses against Adversarial Attacks on Speech Recognition Systemscited by 1
- 2022Universal Fourier Attack for Time Seriescited by 1
- 2022Leveraging Domain Features for Detecting Adversarial Attacks Against Deep Speech Recognition in Noisecited by 1
- 2021Audio Attacks and Defenses against AED Systems -- A Practical Studycited by 0
- 2026Precision-Varying Prediction (PVP): Robustifying ASR systems against adversarial attackscited by 0
- 2026Precision-Varying Prediction (PVP): Robustifying ASR systems against adversarial attacks23 Mar 2026
- 2024Transferable Adversarial Attacks against ASR14 Nov 2024
- 2024SpeechGuard: Exploring the Adversarial Robustness of Multimodal Large Language Models14 May 2024
- 2023DistriBlock: Identifying adversarial audio samples by leveraging characteristics of the output distribution26 May 2023
- 2022Leveraging Domain Features for Detecting Adversarial Attacks Against Deep Speech Recognition in Noise3 Nov 2022
- 2022Universal Fourier Attack for Time Series2 Sep 2022
- 2022Mel Frequency Spectral Domain Defenses against Adversarial Attacks on Speech Recognition Systems29 Mar 2022
- 2022Adversarial Attacks on Speech Recognition Systems for Mission-Critical Applications: A Survey22 Feb 2022
- 2021Audio Attacks and Defenses against AED Systems -- A Practical Study14 Jun 2021
- 2021SoK: A Modularized Approach to Study the Security of Automatic Speech Recognition Systems19 Mar 2021