mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Theory of Functional Connections: A New Method for Estimating the Solutions of PDEs

arXiv 1812.08625 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2018math.NA cs.LG cs.NAcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This article presents a new methodology called deep Theory of Functional Connections (TFC) that estimates the solutions of partial differential equations (PDEs) by combining neural networks with TFC. TFC is used to transform PDEs with boundary conditions into unconstrained optimization problems by embedding the boundary conditions into a "constrained expression." In this work, a neural network is chosen as the free function, and used to solve the now unconstrained optimization problem. The loss function is taken as the square of the residual of the PDE. Then, the neural network is trained in an unsupervised manner to solve the unconstrained optimization problem. This methodology has two major differences when compared with popular methods used to estimate the solutions of PDEs. First, this methodology does not need to discretize the domain into a grid, rather, this methodology randomly samples points from the domain during the training phase. Second, after training, this methodology represents a closed form, analytical, differentiable approximation of the solution throughout the entire training domain. In contrast, other popular methods require interpolation if the estimated solution is desired at points that do not lie on the discretized grid. The deep TFC method for estimating the solution of PDEs is demonstrated on four problems with a variety of boundary conditions.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

17 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Finite Basis Physics-Informed Neural Networks (FBPINNs): a scalable domain decomposition approach for solving differential equationscited by 142
  2. 2022Physics-Informed Machine Learning: A Survey on Problems, Methods and Applicationscited by 88
  3. 2024From PINNs to PIKANs: Recent Advances in Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 73
  4. 2023Residual-based attention in physics-informed neural networkscited by 72
  5. 2024Learning in PINNs: Phase transition, diffusion equilibrium, and generalizationcited by 13
  6. 2022A Unified Hard-Constraint Framework for Solving Geometrically Complex PDEscited by 11
  7. 2025Approximation theory for 1-Lipschitz ResNetscited by 7
  8. 2025Hard-constraining Neumann boundary conditions in physics-informed neural networks via Fourier feature embeddingscited by 5
  9. 2026Physics-Informed Functional Link Constrained Framework with Domain Mapping for Solving Bending Analysis of an Exponentially Loaded Perforated Beamcited by 1
  10. 2021PCNN: A physics-constrained neural network for multiphase flowscited by 0
  11. 2024Augmented neural forms with parametric boundary-matching operators for solving ordinary differential equationscited by 0
  12. 2024Extremization to Fine Tune Physics Informed Neural Networks for Solving Boundary Value Problemscited by 0
5 more
  1. 2024Physics-Informed Graph-Mesh Networks for PDEs: A hybrid approach for complex problemscited by 0
  2. 2026Exact Constraint Enforcement in Physics-Informed Extreme Learning Machines using Null-Space Projection Frameworkcited by 0
  3. 2026Deflation-PINNs: Learning Multiple Solutions for PDEs and Landau-de Gennescited by 0
  4. 2026Comparative Study of Bending Analysis using Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Numerical Dynamic Deflection in Perforated nanobeamcited by 0
  5. 2026Effective Dimensionality as an Operator Invariant for Physics-Preserving Constraint Adaptation in Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 0