mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Guaranteed satisficing and finite regret: Analysis of a cognitive satisficing value function

arXiv 1812.05795 ↗First posted 14 Dec 2018cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As reinforcement learning algorithms are being applied to increasingly complicated and realistic tasks, it is becoming increasingly difficult to solve such problems within a practical time frame. Hence, we focus on a textitsatisficing strategy that looks for an action whose value is above the aspiration level (analogous to the break-even point), rather than the optimal action. In this paper, we introduce a simple mathematical model called risk-sensitive satisficing (RS) that implements a satisficing strategy by integrating risk-averse and risk-prone attitudes under the greedy policy. We apply the proposed model to the K-armed bandit problems, which constitute the most basic class of reinforcement learning tasks, and prove two propositions. The first is that RS is guaranteed to find an action whose value is above the aspiration level. The second is that the regret (expected loss) of RS is upper bounded by a finite value, given that the aspiration level is set to an "optimal level" so that satisficing implies optimizing. We confirm the results through numerical simulations and compare the performance of RS with that of other representative algorithms for the K-armed bandit problems.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

4 papers.