A Technical Survey on Statistical Modelling and Design Methods for Crowdsourcing Quality Control
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Online crowdsourcing provides a scalable and inexpensive means to collect knowledge (e.g. labels) about various types of data items (e.g. text, audio, video). However, it is also known to result in large variance in the quality of recorded responses which often cannot be directly used for training machine learning systems. To resolve this issue, a lot of work has been conducted to control the response quality such that low-quality responses cannot adversely affect the performance of the machine learning systems. Such work is referred to as the quality control for crowdsourcing. Past quality control research can be divided into two major branches: quality control mechanism design and statistical models. The first branch focuses on designing measures, thresholds, interfaces and workflows for payment, gamification, question assignment and other mechanisms that influence workers' behaviour. The second branch focuses on developing statistical models to perform effective aggregation of responses to infer correct responses. The two branches are connected as statistical models (i) provide parameter estimates to support the measure and threshold calculation, and (ii) encode modelling assumptions used to derive (theoretical) performance guarantees for the mechanisms. There are surveys regarding each branch but they lack technical details about the other branch. Our survey is the first to bridge the two branches by providing technical details on how they work together under frameworks that systematically unify crowdsourcing aspects modelled by both of them to determine the response quality. We are also the first to provide taxonomies of quality control papers based on the proposed frameworks. Finally, we specify the current limitations and the corresponding future directions for the quality control research.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
7 papers.
- 2021A Survey on Cost Types, Interaction Schemes, and Annotator Performance Models in Selection Algorithms for Active Learning in Classificationcited by 17
- 2022Learning from Multiple Expert Annotators for Enhancing Anomaly Detection in Medical Image Analysiscited by 13
- 2024SkillAggregation: Reference-free LLM-Dependent Aggregationcited by 6
- 2021Learning from Multiple Annotators by Incorporating Instance Featurescited by 4
- 2022A Light-weight, Effective and Efficient Model for Label Aggregation in Crowdsourcingcited by 2
- 2023Improving Object Detection in Medical Image Analysis through Multiple Expert Annotators: An Empirical Investigationcited by 1
- 2022Towards AI-Empowered Crowdsourcingcited by 0
- 2024SkillAggregation: Reference-free LLM-Dependent Aggregation14 Oct 2024
- 2023Improving Object Detection in Medical Image Analysis through Multiple Expert Annotators: An Empirical Investigation29 Mar 2023
- 2022Towards AI-Empowered Crowdsourcing28 Dec 2022
- 2022A Light-weight, Effective and Efficient Model for Label Aggregation in Crowdsourcing19 Nov 2022
- 2022Learning from Multiple Expert Annotators for Enhancing Anomaly Detection in Medical Image Analysis20 Mar 2022
- 2021A Survey on Cost Types, Interaction Schemes, and Annotator Performance Models in Selection Algorithms for Active Learning in Classification23 Sep 2021
- 2021Learning from Multiple Annotators by Incorporating Instance Features29 Jun 2021