Multi-agent Deep Reinforcement Learning with Extremely Noisy Observations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-agent reinforcement learning systems aim to provide interacting agents with the ability to collaboratively learn and adapt to the behaviour of other agents. In many real-world applications, the agents can only acquire a partial view of the world. Here we consider a setting whereby most agents' observations are also extremely noisy, hence only weakly correlated to the true state of the environment. Under these circumstances, learning an optimal policy becomes particularly challenging, even in the unrealistic case that an agent's policy can be made conditional upon all other agents' observations. To overcome these difficulties, we propose a multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm enhanced by a communication medium (MADDPG-M), which implements a two-level, concurrent learning mechanism. An agent's policy depends on its own private observations as well as those explicitly shared by others through a communication medium. At any given point in time, an agent must decide whether its private observations are sufficiently informative to be shared with others. However, our environments provide no explicit feedback informing an agent whether a communication action is beneficial, rather the communication policies must also be learned through experience concurrently to the main policies. Our experimental results demonstrate that the algorithm performs well in six highly non-stationary environments of progressively higher complexity, and offers substantial performance gains compared to the baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 4.
10 papers.
- 2022A Survey of Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning with Communicationcited by 103
- 2024Generative Emergent Communication: Large Language Model is a Collective World Modelcited by 15
- 2022Autonomy and Intelligence in the Computing Continuum: Challenges, Enablers, and Future Directions for Orchestrationcited by 12
- 2026The Five Ws of Multi-Agent Communication: Who Talks to Whom, When, What, and Why -- A Survey from MARL to Emergent Language and LLMscited by 10
- 2023Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Applications, Visionary Prospects, and Challengescited by 5
- 2023Noise Distribution Decomposition based Multi-Agent Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
- 2024Towards Fault Tolerance in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026Finding the Weakest Link: Adversarial Attack against Multi-Agent Communicationscited by 0
- 2026Action-Factored Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Scalable Quantum Device Tuningcited by 0
- 2026SIGMA: Structured Noise-Effect-Aware Grouped Multi-Agent Aggregationcited by 0
- 2026SIGMA: Structured Noise-Effect-Aware Grouped Multi-Agent Aggregation27 Aug 2026
- 2026Action-Factored Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Scalable Quantum Device Tuning10 Jul 2026
- 2026Finding the Weakest Link: Adversarial Attack against Multi-Agent Communications13 May 2026
- 2026The Five Ws of Multi-Agent Communication: Who Talks to Whom, When, What, and Why -- A Survey from MARL to Emergent Language and LLMs12 Feb 2026
- 2024Generative Emergent Communication: Large Language Model is a Collective World Model31 Dec 2024
- 2024Towards Fault Tolerance in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning30 Nov 2024
- 2023Noise Distribution Decomposition based Multi-Agent Distributional Reinforcement Learning12 Dec 2023
- 2023Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Applications, Visionary Prospects, and Challenges17 May 2023
- 2022Autonomy and Intelligence in the Computing Continuum: Challenges, Enablers, and Future Directions for Orchestration3 May 2022
- 2022A Survey of Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning with Communication16 Mar 2022