mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An equivalence between critical points for rank constraints versus low-rank factorizations

arXiv 1812.00404 ↗First posted 2 Dec 2018math.OCcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Two common approaches in low-rank optimization problems are either working directly with a rank constraint on the matrix variable, or optimizing over a low-rank factorization so that the rank constraint is implicitly ensured. In this paper, we study the natural connection between the rank-constrained and factorized approaches. We show that all second-order stationary points of the factorized objective function correspond to fixed points of projected gradient descent run on the original problem (where the projection step enforces the rank constraint). This result allows us to unify many existing optimization guarantees that have been proved specifically in either the rank-constrained or the factorized setting, and leads to new results for certain settings of the problem. We demonstrate application of our results to several concrete low-rank optimization problems arising in matrix inverse problems.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

4 papers.