The Power of The Hybrid Model for Mean Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We explore the power of the hybrid model of differential privacy (DP), in which some users desire the guarantees of the local model of DP and others are content with receiving the trusted-curator model guarantees. In particular, we study the utility of hybrid model estimators that compute the mean of arbitrary real-valued distributions with bounded support. When the curator knows the distribution's variance, we design a hybrid estimator that, for realistic datasets and parameter settings, achieves a constant factor improvement over natural baselines. We then analytically characterize how the estimator's utility is parameterized by the problem setting and parameter choices. When the distribution's variance is unknown, we design a heuristic hybrid estimator and analyze how it compares to the baselines. We find that it often performs better than the baselines, and sometimes almost as well as the known-variance estimator. We then answer the question of how our estimator's utility is affected when users' data are not drawn from the same distribution, but rather from distributions dependent on their trust model preference. Concretely, we examine the implications of the two groups' distributions diverging and show that in some cases, our estimators maintain fairly high utility. We then demonstrate how our hybrid estimator can be incorporated as a sub-component in more complex, higher-dimensional applications. Finally, we propose a new privacy amplification notion for the hybrid model that emerges due to interaction between the groups, and derive corresponding amplification results for our hybrid estimators.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 6; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021Efficient Mean Estimation with Pure Differential Privacy via a Sum-of-Squares Exponential Mechanismcited by 50
- 2023Why Is Public Pretraining Necessary for Private Model Training?cited by 37
- 2021A Private and Computationally-Efficient Estimator for Unbounded Gaussianscited by 34
- 2022New Lower Bounds for Private Estimation and a Generalized Fingerprinting Lemmacited by 33
- 2022Private Estimation with Public Datacited by 32
- 2023Private Distribution Learning with Public Data: The View from Sample Compressioncited by 14
- 2023A Bias-Accuracy-Privacy Trilemma for Statistical Estimationcited by 12
- 2023Mean Estimation Under Heterogeneous Privacy: Some Privacy Can Be Freecited by 6
- 2023A Polynomial Time, Pure Differentially Private Estimator for Binary Product Distributionscited by 5
- 2023On the Benefits of Public Representations for Private Transfer Learning under Distribution Shiftcited by 5
- 2025Lower Bounds for Public-Private Learning under Distribution Shiftcited by 0
- 2025Lower Bounds for Public-Private Learning under Distribution Shift23 Jul 2025
- 2023On the Benefits of Public Representations for Private Transfer Learning under Distribution Shift24 Dec 2023
- 2023Private Distribution Learning with Public Data: The View from Sample Compression11 Aug 2023
- 2023Mean Estimation Under Heterogeneous Privacy: Some Privacy Can Be Free27 Apr 2023
- 2023A Polynomial Time, Pure Differentially Private Estimator for Binary Product Distributions13 Apr 2023
- 2023Why Is Public Pretraining Necessary for Private Model Training?19 Feb 2023
- 2023A Bias-Accuracy-Privacy Trilemma for Statistical Estimation30 Jan 2023
- 2022Private Estimation with Public Data16 Aug 2022
- 2022New Lower Bounds for Private Estimation and a Generalized Fingerprinting Lemma17 May 2022
- 2021Efficient Mean Estimation with Pure Differential Privacy via a Sum-of-Squares Exponential Mechanism25 Nov 2021
- 2021A Private and Computationally-Efficient Estimator for Unbounded Gaussians8 Nov 2021