Intersectionality: Multiple Group Fairness in Expectation Constraints
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Group fairness is an important concern for machine learning researchers, developers, and regulators. However, the strictness to which models must be constrained to be considered fair is still under debate. The focus of this work is on constraining the expected outcome of subpopulations in kernel regression and, in particular, decision tree regression, with application to random forests, boosted trees and other ensemble models. While individual constraints were previously addressed, this work addresses concerns about incorporating multiple constraints simultaneously. The proposed solution does not affect the order of computational or memory complexity of the decision trees and is easily integrated into models post training.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2.
3 papers.
- 2023Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairnesscited by 26
- 2023Fairness and Privacy in Federated Learning and Their Implications in Healthcarecited by 3
- 2021Computability, Complexity, Consistency and Controllability: A Four C's Framework for cross-disciplinary Ethical Algorithm Researchcited by 0
- 2023Fairness and Privacy in Federated Learning and Their Implications in Healthcare15 Aug 2023
- 2023Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairness16 Mar 2023
- 2021Computability, Complexity, Consistency and Controllability: A Four C's Framework for cross-disciplinary Ethical Algorithm Research30 Jan 2021