How the Softmax Output is Misleading for Evaluating the Strength of Adversarial Examples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Even before deep learning architectures became the de facto models for complex computer vision tasks, the softmax function was, given its elegant properties, already used to analyze the predictions of feedforward neural networks. Nowadays, the output of the softmax function is also commonly used to assess the strength of adversarial examples: malicious data points designed to fail machine learning models during the testing phase. However, in this paper, we show that it is possible to generate adversarial examples that take advantage of some properties of the softmax function, leading to undesired outcomes when interpreting the strength of the adversarial examples at hand. Specifically, we argue that the output of the softmax function is a poor indicator when the strength of an adversarial example is analyzed and that this indicator can be easily tricked by already existing methods for adversarial example generation.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Understanding Softmax Confidence and Uncertaintycited by 62
- 2021Increasing the Confidence of Deep Neural Networks by Coverage Analysiscited by 9
- 2022Confidence estimation of classification based on the distribution of the neural network output layercited by 7
- 2021Explainable Adversarial Attacks in Deep Neural Networks Using Activation Profilescited by 6
- 2022Confidence estimation of classification based on the distribution of the neural network output layer14 Oct 2022
- 2021Understanding Softmax Confidence and Uncertainty9 Jun 2021
- 2021Explainable Adversarial Attacks in Deep Neural Networks Using Activation Profiles18 Mar 2021
- 2021Increasing the Confidence of Deep Neural Networks by Coverage Analysis28 Jan 2021