mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Pareto Optimization for Subset Selection with Dynamic Cost Constraints

arXiv 1811.07806 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2018cs.DS cs.NEcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the subset selection problem for function f with constraint bound B that changes over time. Within the area of submodular optimization, various greedy approaches are commonly used. For dynamic environments we observe that the adaptive variants of these greedy approaches are not able to maintain their approximation quality. Investigating the recently introduced POMC Pareto optimization approach, we show that this algorithm efficiently computes a φ= (αf/2)(1-frac1eαf)-approximation, where αf is the submodularity ratio of f, for each possible constraint bound b ≤ B. Furthermore, we show that POMC is able to adapt its set of solutions quickly in the case that B increases. Our experimental investigations for the influence maximization in social networks show the advantage of POMC over generalized greedy algorithms. We also consider EAMC, a new evolutionary algorithm with polynomial expected time guarantee to maintain φ approximation ratio, and NSGA-II with two different population sizes as advanced multi-objective optimization algorithm, to demonstrate their challenges in optimizing the maximum coverage problem. Our empirical analysis shows that, within the same number of evaluations, POMC is able to perform as good as NSGA-II under linear constraint, while EAMC performs significantly worse than all considered algorithms in most cases.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 6; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Mathematical Runtime Analysis for the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II)cited by 8
  2. 2023Stochastic Population Update Can Provably Be Helpful in Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithmscited by 8
  3. 2021Result Diversification by Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms with Theoretical Guaranteescited by 5
  4. 2024Using 3-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for the Dynamic Chance Constrained Knapsack Problemcited by 4
  5. 2023Fast Pareto Optimization Using Sliding Window Selectioncited by 3
  6. 2022Approximation Guarantees for the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II)cited by 2
  7. 2021Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms are Generally Good: Maximizing Monotone Submodular Functions over Sequencescited by 1
  8. 2023Optimizing Chance-Constrained Submodular Problems with Variable Uncertaintiescited by 1
  9. 2026On the use of evolutionary optimization for the dynamic chance constrained open-pit mine scheduling problemcited by 1
  10. 2022Biased Hypothesis Formation From Projection Pursuitcited by 0
  11. 2024A Block-Coordinate Descent EMO Algorithm: Theoretical and Empirical Analysiscited by 0
  12. 2024Sliding Window 3-Objective Pareto Optimization for Problems with Chance Constraintscited by 0
3 more
  1. 2024Detection-Rate-Emphasized Multi-objective Evolutionary Feature Selection for Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 0
  2. 2024Archive-based Single-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Submodular Optimizationcited by 0
  3. 2024Pareto Data Framework: Steps Towards Resource-Efficient Decision Making Using Minimum Viable Data (MVD)cited by 0