Mean Square Prediction Error of Misspecified Gaussian Process Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Nonparametric modeling approaches show very promising results in the area of system identification and control. A naturally provided model confidence is highly relevant for system-theoretical considerations to provide guarantees for application scenarios. Gaussian process regression represents one approach which provides such an indicator for the model confidence. However, this measure is only valid if the covariance function and its hyperparameters fit the underlying data generating process. In this paper, we derive an upper bound for the mean square prediction error of misspecified Gaussian process models based on a pseudo-concave optimization problem. We present application scenarios and a simulation to compare the derived upper bound with the true mean square error.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Practical and Rigorous Uncertainty Bounds for Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 49
- 2021Gaussian Process Uniform Error Bounds with Unknown Hyperparameters for Safety-Critical Applicationscited by 17
- 2025An Analysis of Safety Guarantees in Multi-Task Bayesian Optimizationcited by 1
- 2023Error Bounds for Kernel-Based Linear System Identification with Unknown Hyperparameterscited by 0
- 2025An Analysis of Safety Guarantees in Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization11 Mar 2025
- 2023Error Bounds for Kernel-Based Linear System Identification with Unknown Hyperparameters17 Mar 2023
- 2021Gaussian Process Uniform Error Bounds with Unknown Hyperparameters for Safety-Critical Applications6 Sep 2021
- 2021Practical and Rigorous Uncertainty Bounds for Gaussian Process Regression6 May 2021