mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reward-estimation variance elimination in sequential decision processes

arXiv 1811.06225 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2018cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Policy gradient methods are very attractive in reinforcement learning due to their model-free nature and convergence guarantees. These methods, however, suffer from high variance in gradient estimation, resulting in poor sample efficiency. To mitigate this issue, a number of variance-reduction approaches have been proposed. Unfortunately, in the challenging problems with delayed rewards, these approaches either bring a relatively modest improvement or do reduce variance at expense of introducing a bias and undermining convergence. The unbiased methods of gradient estimation, in general, only partially reduce variance, without eliminating it completely even in the limit of exact knowledge of the value functions and problem dynamics, as one might have wished. In this work we propose an unbiased method that does completely eliminate variance under some, commonly encountered, conditions. Of practical interest is the limit of deterministic dynamics and small policy stochasticity. In the case of a quadratic value function, as in linear quadratic Gaussian models, the policy randomness need not be small. We use such a model to analyze performance of the proposed variance-elimination approach and compare it with standard variance-reduction methods. The core idea behind the approach is to use control variates at all future times down the trajectory. We present both a model-based and model-free formulations.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2020: 1; 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

4 papers.