A Very Brief and Critical Discussion on AutoML
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This contribution presents a very brief and critical discussion on automated machine learning (AutoML), which is categorized here into two classes, referred to as narrow AutoML and generalized AutoML, respectively. The conclusions yielded from this discussion can be summarized as follows: (1) most existent research on AutoML belongs to the class of narrow AutoML; (2) advances in narrow AutoML are mainly motivated by commercial needs, while any possible benefit obtained is definitely at a cost of increase in computing burdens; (3)the concept of generalized AutoML has a strong tie in spirit with artificial general intelligence (AGI), also called "strong AI", for which obstacles abound for obtaining pivotal progresses.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2021"Weak AI" is Likely to Never Become "Strong AI", So What is its Greatest Value for us?cited by 0
- 2021Surrogate Model Based Hyperparameter Tuning for Deep Learning with SPOTcited by 0
- 2025Exploring the Link Between Bayesian Inference and Embodied Intelligence: Toward Open Physical-World Embodied AI Systemscited by 0
- 2025Exploring the Link Between Bayesian Inference and Embodied Intelligence: Toward Open Physical-World Embodied AI Systems29 Jul 2025
- 2021Surrogate Model Based Hyperparameter Tuning for Deep Learning with SPOT30 May 2021
- 2021"Weak AI" is Likely to Never Become "Strong AI", So What is its Greatest Value for us?29 Mar 2021