Triple consistency loss for pairing distributions in GAN-based face synthesis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative Adversarial Networks have shown impressive results for the task of object translation, including face-to-face translation. A key component behind the success of recent approaches is the self-consistency loss, which encourages a network to recover the original input image when the output generated for a desired attribute is itself passed through the same network, but with the target attribute inverted. While the self-consistency loss yields photo-realistic results, it can be shown that the input and target domains, supposed to be close, differ substantially. This is empirically found by observing that a network recovers the input image even if attributes other than the inversion of the original goal are set as target. This stops one combining networks for different tasks, or using a network to do progressive forward passes. In this paper, we show empirical evidence of this effect, and propose a new loss to bridge the gap between the distributions of the input and target domains. This "triple consistency loss", aims to minimise the distance between the outputs generated by the network for different routes to the target, independent of any intermediate steps. To show this is effective, we incorporate the triple consistency loss into the training of a new landmark-guided face to face synthesis, where, contrary to previous works, the generated images can simultaneously undergo a large transformation in both expression and pose. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to tackle the problem of mismatching distributions in self-domain synthesis, and to propose "in-the-wild" landmark-guided synthesis. Code will be available at https://github.com/ESanchezLozano/GANnotation
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Deepfakes Generation and Detection: State-of-the-art, open challenges, countermeasures, and way forwardcited by 82
- 2022FSGANv2: Improved Subject Agnostic Face Swapping and Reenactmentcited by 33
- 2024A Large-scale Universal Evaluation Benchmark For Face Forgery Detectioncited by 3
- 2022Deep Fake Detection, Deterrence and Response: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 0
- 2024A Large-scale Universal Evaluation Benchmark For Face Forgery Detection13 Jun 2024
- 2022Deep Fake Detection, Deterrence and Response: Challenges and Opportunities26 Nov 2022
- 2022FSGANv2: Improved Subject Agnostic Face Swapping and Reenactment25 Feb 2022
- 2021Deepfakes Generation and Detection: State-of-the-art, open challenges, countermeasures, and way forward25 Feb 2021