Compositional Language Understanding with Text-based Relational Reasoning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks for natural language reasoning have largely focused on extractive, fact-based question-answering (QA) and common-sense inference. However, it is also crucial to understand the extent to which neural networks can perform relational reasoning and combinatorial generalization from natural language---abilities that are often obscured by annotation artifacts and the dominance of language modeling in standard QA benchmarks. In this work, we present a novel benchmark dataset for language understanding that isolates performance on relational reasoning. We also present a neural message-passing baseline and show that this model, which incorporates a relational inductive bias, is superior at combinatorial generalization compared to a traditional recurrent neural network approach.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
3 papers.
- 2024Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 152
- 2025Reasoning with Graphs: Structuring Implicit Knowledge to Enhance LLMs Reasoningcited by 8
- 2025Can Large Language Models Unveil the Mysteries? An Exploration of Their Ability to Unlock Information in Complex Scenarioscited by 1
- 2025Can Large Language Models Unveil the Mysteries? An Exploration of Their Ability to Unlock Information in Complex Scenarios27 Feb 2025
- 2025Reasoning with Graphs: Structuring Implicit Knowledge to Enhance LLMs Reasoning14 Jan 2025
- 2024Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language Models19 Feb 2024