mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Tight Approximation Ratio of Anonymous Pricing

arXiv 1811.00763 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2018cs.GTcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider two canonical Bayesian mechanism design settings. In the single-item setting, we prove tight approximation ratio for anonymous pricing: compared with Myerson Auction, it extracts at least frac12.62-fraction of revenue; there is a matching lower-bound example. In the unit-demand single-buyer setting, we prove tight approximation ratio between the simplest and optimal deterministic mechanisms: in terms of revenue, uniform pricing admits a 2.62-approximation of item pricing; we further validate the tightness of this ratio. These results settle two open problems asked in~citeH13,CD15,AHNPY15,L17,JLTX18. As an implication, in the single-item setting: we improve the approximation ratio of the second-price auction with anonymous reserve to 2.62, which breaks the state-of-the-art upper bound of e ≈ 2.72.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.