mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Markov Decision Process: Beyond Rectangularity

arXiv 1811.00215 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2018math.OCcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider a robust approach to address uncertainty in model parameters in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), which are widely used to model dynamic optimization in many applications. Most prior works consider the case where the uncertainty on transitions related to different states is uncoupled and the adversary is allowed to select the worst possible realization for each state unrelated to others, potentially leading to highly conservative solutions. On the other hand, the case of general uncertainty sets is known to be intractable. We consider a factor model for probability transitions where the transition probability is a linear function of a factor matrix that is uncertain and belongs to a factor matrix uncertainty set. This is a fairly general model of uncertainty in probability transitions, allowing the decision maker to model dependence between probability transitions across different states and it is significantly less conservative than prior approaches. We show that under an underlying rectangularity assumption, we can efficiently compute an optimal robust policy under the factor matrix uncertainty model. Furthermore, we show that there is an optimal robust policy that is deterministic, which is of interest from an interpretability standpoint. We also introduce the robust counterpart of important structural results of classical MDPs, including the maximum principle and Blackwell optimality, and we provide a computational study to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in mitigating the conservativeness of robust policies.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2020: 1; 2021: 4; 2022: 8; 2023: 7; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Distributionally Robust Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Near-Optimal Sample Complexitycited by 85
  2. 2022Policy Gradient Method For Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 67
  3. 2020Bayesian Robust Optimization for Imitation Learningcited by 28
  4. 2023Robust Average-Reward Markov Decision Processescited by 22
  5. 2023Model-Free Robust Average-Reward Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
  6. 2022Efficient Policy Iteration for Robust Markov Decision Processes via Regularizationcited by 19
  7. 2022Robust Anytime Learning of Markov Decision Processescited by 16
  8. 2023Robust Markov Decision Processes without Model Estimationcited by 11
  9. 2023Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Beyond Probabilitiescited by 8
  10. 2021Explicit Explore, Exploit, or Escape (E4): near-optimal safety-constrained reinforcement learning in polynomial timecited by 6
  11. 2022The Geometry of Robust Value Functionscited by 6
  12. 2022Group Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning with Hierarchical Latent Variablescited by 6
12 more
  1. 2021Robustness and risk management via distributional dynamic programmingcited by 5
  2. 2023An Efficient Solution to s-Rectangular Robust Markov Decision Processescited by 5
  3. 2021Conic Blackwell Algorithm: Parameter-Free Convex-Concave Saddle-Point Solvingcited by 4
  4. 2022Solving optimization problems with Blackwell approachabilitycited by 4
  5. 2025Dual Formulation for Non-Rectangular Lp Robust Markov Decision Processescited by 3
  6. 2021Interpretable Machine Learning for Resource Allocation with Application to Ventilator Triagecited by 2
  7. 2024Time-Constrained Robust MDPscited by 2
  8. 2026Robust Optimization for Mitigating Reward Hacking with Correlated Proxiescited by 2
  9. 2022Robust Phi-Divergence MDPscited by 1
  10. 2023Twice Regularized Markov Decision Processes: The Equivalence between Robustness and Regularizationcited by 1
  11. 2023On the Convergence of Modified Policy Iteration in Risk Sensitive Exponential Cost Markov Decision Processescited by 0
  12. 2024Percentile Criterion Optimization in Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 0