mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dimensionality Reduction has Quantifiable Imperfections: Two Geometric Bounds

arXiv 1811.00115 ↗First posted 31 Oct 2018stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we investigate Dimensionality reduction (DR) maps in an information retrieval setting from a quantitative topology point of view. In particular, we show that no DR maps can achieve perfect precision and perfect recall simultaneously. Thus a continuous DR map must have imperfect precision. We further prove an upper bound on the precision of Lipschitz continuous DR maps. While precision is a natural measure in an information retrieval setting, it does not measure `how' wrong the retrieved data is. We therefore propose a new measure based on Wasserstein distance that comes with similar theoretical guarantee. A key technical step in our proofs is a particular optimization problem of the L2-Wasserstein distance over a constrained set of distributions. We provide a complete solution to this optimization problem, which can be of independent interest on the technical side.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.