Dead Time Compensation for High-Flux Ranging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dead time effects have been considered a major limitation for fast data acquisition in various time-correlated single photon counting applications, since a commonly adopted approach for dead time mitigation is to operate in the low-flux regime where dead time effects can be ignored. Through the application of lidar ranging, this work explores the empirical distribution of detection times in the presence of dead time and demonstrates that an accurate statistical model can result in reduced ranging error with shorter data acquisition time when operating in the high-flux regime. Specifically, we show that the empirical distribution of detection times converges to the stationary distribution of a Markov chain. Depth estimation can then be performed by passing the empirical distribution through a filter matched to the stationary distribution. Moreover, based on the Markov chain model, we formulate the recovery of arrival distribution from detection distribution as a nonlinear inverse problem and solve it via provably convergent mathematical optimization. By comparing per-detection Fisher information for depth estimation from high- and low-flux detection time distributions, we provide an analytical basis for possible improvement of ranging performance resulting from the presence of dead time. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our formulation and algorithm via simulations of lidar ranging.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2023Transient Neural Radiance Fields for Lidar View Synthesis and 3D Reconstructioncited by 18
- 2021Passive Inter-Photon Imagingcited by 16
- 2021Adaptive Gating for Single-Photon 3D Imagingcited by 7
- 2024Quanta Video Restorationcited by 3
- 2022Non-Line-of-Sight Tracking and Mapping with an Active Corner Cameracited by 2
- 2024Analysis and Improvement of Rank-Ordered Mean Algorithm in Single-Photon LiDARcited by 1
- 2025Joint Depth and Reflectivity Estimation using Single-Photon LiDARcited by 0
- 2026SP-TransientBench: A Real-Captured Single Photon Perception Benchmarkcited by 0
- 2026High-Flux Count-Free Single-Photon 3D Camerascited by 0
- 2026High-Flux Count-Free Single-Photon 3D Cameras18 Aug 2026
- 2026SP-TransientBench: A Real-Captured Single Photon Perception Benchmark16 Jun 2026
- 2025Joint Depth and Reflectivity Estimation using Single-Photon LiDAR19 May 2025
- 2024Quanta Video Restoration19 Oct 2024
- 2024Analysis and Improvement of Rank-Ordered Mean Algorithm in Single-Photon LiDAR29 Jul 2024
- 2023Transient Neural Radiance Fields for Lidar View Synthesis and 3D Reconstruction14 Jul 2023
- 2022Non-Line-of-Sight Tracking and Mapping with an Active Corner Camera2 Aug 2022
- 2021Adaptive Gating for Single-Photon 3D Imaging30 Nov 2021
- 2021Passive Inter-Photon Imaging31 Mar 2021