mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sample Efficient Algorithms for Learning Quantum Channels in PAC Model and the Approximate State Discrimination Problem

arXiv 1810.10938 ↗First posted 25 Oct 2018quant-ph cs.CC cs.LGcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We generalize the PAC (probably approximately correct) learning model to the quantum world by generalizing the concepts from classical functions to quantum processes, defining the problem of PAC learning quantum process, and study its sample complexity. In the problem of PAC learning quantum process, we want to learn an ε-approximate of an unknown quantum process c^* from a known finite concept class C with probability 1-δ using samples (x1,c^*(x1)),(x2,c^*(x2)),dots, where x1,x2, dots are computational basis states sampled from an unknown distribution D and c^*(x1),c^*(x2),dots are the (possibly mixed) quantum states outputted by c^*. The special case of PAC-learning quantum process under constant input reduces to a natural problem which we named as approximate state discrimination, where we are given copies of an unknown quantum state c^* from an known finite set C, and we want to learn with probability 1-δ an ε-approximate of c^* with as few copies of c^* as possible. We show that the problem of PAC learning quantum process can be solved with Oleft(fraclog|C| + log(1/ δ) ε2right) samples when the outputs are pure states and Oleft(fraclog3 |C|(log |C|+log(1/ δ)) ε2right) samples if the outputs can be mixed. Some implications of our results are that we can PAC-learn a polynomial sized quantum circuit in polynomial samples and approximate state discrimination can be solved in polynomial samples even when concept class size |C| is exponential in the number of qubits, an exponentially improvement over a full state tomography.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

16 papers.

Sort: