Law and Adversarial Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When machine learning systems fail because of adversarial manipulation, how should society expect the law to respond? Through scenarios grounded in adversarial ML literature, we explore how some aspects of computer crime, copyright, and tort law interface with perturbation, poisoning, model stealing and model inversion attacks to show how some attacks are more likely to result in liability than others. We end with a call for action to ML researchers to invest in transparent benchmarks of attacks and defenses; architect ML systems with forensics in mind and finally, think more about adversarial machine learning in the context of civil liberties. The paper is targeted towards ML researchers who have no legal background.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022The Many Faces of Adversarial Riskcited by 28
- 2021On managing vulnerabilities in AI/ML systemscited by 5
- 2022Efficient Learning of Interpretable Classification Rulescited by 5
- 2023You Don't Need Robust Machine Learning to Manage Adversarial Attack Riskscited by 3
- 2024On Feasibility of Intent Obfuscating Attackscited by 0
- 2024On Feasibility of Intent Obfuscating Attacks22 Jul 2024
- 2023You Don't Need Robust Machine Learning to Manage Adversarial Attack Risks16 Jun 2023
- 2022Efficient Learning of Interpretable Classification Rules14 May 2022
- 2022The Many Faces of Adversarial Risk22 Jan 2022
- 2021On managing vulnerabilities in AI/ML systems22 Jan 2021