Projecting Trouble: Light Based Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning Classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work demonstrates a physical attack on a deep learning image classification system using projected light onto a physical scene. Prior work is dominated by techniques for creating adversarial examples which directly manipulate the digital input of the classifier. Such an attack is limited to scenarios where the adversary can directly update the inputs to the classifier. This could happen by intercepting and modifying the inputs to an online API such as Clarifai or Cloud Vision. Such limitations have led to a vein of research around physical attacks where objects are constructed to be inherently adversarial or adversarial modifications are added to cause misclassification. Our work differs from other physical attacks in that we can cause misclassification dynamically without altering physical objects in a permanent way. We construct an experimental setup which includes a light projection source, an object for classification, and a camera to capture the scene. Experiments are conducted against 2D and 3D objects from CIFAR-10. Initial tests show projected light patterns selected via differential evolution could degrade classification from 98% to 22% and 89% to 43% probability for 2D and 3D targets respectively. Subsequent experiments explore sensitivity to physical setup and compare two additional baseline conditions for all 10 CIFAR classes. Some physical targets are more susceptible to perturbation. Simple attacks show near equivalent success, and 6 of the 10 classes were disrupted by light.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
9 papers.
- 2022Physical Adversarial Attack meets Computer Vision: A Decade Surveycited by 66
- 2021Optical Adversarial Attackcited by 43
- 2022A Survey on Physical Adversarial Attack in Computer Visioncited by 24
- 2022Physical-World Optical Adversarial Attacks on 3D Face Recognitioncited by 23
- 2023Physical Adversarial Attacks For Camera-based Smart Systems: Current Trends, Categorization, Applications, Research Challenges, and Future Outlookcited by 20
- 2023Adversarial Examples in the Physical World: A Surveycited by 10
- 2023State-of-the-art optical-based physical adversarial attacks for deep learning computer vision systemscited by 8
- 2023Why Don't You Clean Your Glasses? Perception Attacks with Dynamic Optical Perturbationscited by 2
- 2025A Survey of Adversarial Defenses in Vision-based Systems: Categorization, Methods and Challengescited by 1
- 2025A Survey of Adversarial Defenses in Vision-based Systems: Categorization, Methods and Challenges1 Mar 2025
- 2023Adversarial Examples in the Physical World: A Survey1 Nov 2023
- 2023Physical Adversarial Attacks For Camera-based Smart Systems: Current Trends, Categorization, Applications, Research Challenges, and Future Outlook11 Aug 2023
- 2023Why Don't You Clean Your Glasses? Perception Attacks with Dynamic Optical Perturbations24 Jul 2023
- 2023State-of-the-art optical-based physical adversarial attacks for deep learning computer vision systems22 Mar 2023
- 2022Physical Adversarial Attack meets Computer Vision: A Decade Survey30 Sep 2022
- 2022A Survey on Physical Adversarial Attack in Computer Vision28 Sep 2022
- 2022Physical-World Optical Adversarial Attacks on 3D Face Recognition26 May 2022
- 2021Optical Adversarial Attack13 Aug 2021