Explaining Machine Learning Models using Entropic Variable Projection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we present a new explainability formalism designed to shed light on how each input variable of a test set impacts the predictions of machine learning models. Hence, we propose a group explainability formalism for trained machine learning decision rules, based on their response to the variability of the input variables distribution. In order to emphasize the impact of each input variable, this formalism uses an information theory framework that quantifies the influence of all input-output observations based on entropic projections. This is thus the first unified and model agnostic formalism enabling data scientists to interpret the dependence between the input variables, their impact on the prediction errors, and their influence on the output predictions. Convergence rates of the entropic projections are provided in the large sample case. Most importantly, we prove that computing an explanation in our framework has a low algorithmic complexity, making it scalable to real-life large datasets. We illustrate our strategy by explaining complex decision rules learned by using XGBoost, Random Forest or Deep Neural Network classifiers on various datasets such as Adult Income, MNIST, CelebA, Boston Housing, Iris, as well as synthetic ones. We finally make clear its differences with the explainability strategies LIME and SHAP, that are based on single observations. Results can be reproduced by using the freely distributed Python toolbox https://gems-ai.aniti.fr/.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022Quantile-constrained Wasserstein projections for robust interpretability of numerical and machine learning modelscited by 4
- 2024Towards certifiable AI in aviation: landscape, challenges, and opportunitiescited by 2
- 2025Exploring specialization and sensitivity of convolutional neural networks in the context of simultaneous image augmentationscited by 2
- 2025Exposing the Illusion of Fairness: Auditing Vulnerabilities to Distributional Manipulation Attackscited by 2
- 2026Evaluating Black-Box Vulnerabilities with Wasserstein-Constrained Data Perturbationscited by 0
- 2026Evaluating Black-Box Vulnerabilities with Wasserstein-Constrained Data Perturbations16 Mar 2026
- 2025Exposing the Illusion of Fairness: Auditing Vulnerabilities to Distributional Manipulation Attacks28 Jul 2025
- 2025Exploring specialization and sensitivity of convolutional neural networks in the context of simultaneous image augmentations5 Mar 2025
- 2024Towards certifiable AI in aviation: landscape, challenges, and opportunities13 Sep 2024
- 2022Quantile-constrained Wasserstein projections for robust interpretability of numerical and machine learning models23 Sep 2022