Multi-Task Deep Learning for Legal Document Translation, Summarization and Multi-Label Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The digitalization of the legal domain has been ongoing for a couple of years. In that process, the application of different machine learning (ML) techniques is crucial. Tasks such as the classification of legal documents or contract clauses as well as the translation of those are highly relevant. On the other side, digitized documents are barely accessible in this field, particularly in Germany. Today, deep learning (DL) is one of the hot topics with many publications and various applications. Sometimes it provides results outperforming the human level. Hence this technique may be feasible for the legal domain as well. However, DL requires thousands of samples to provide decent results. A potential solution to this problem is multi-task DL to enable transfer learning. This approach may be able to overcome the data scarcity problem in the legal domain, specifically for the German language. We applied the state of the art multi-task model on three tasks: translation, summarization, and multi-label classification. The experiments were conducted on legal document corpora utilizing several task combinations as well as various model parameters. The goal was to find the optimal configuration for the tasks at hand within the legal domain. The multi-task DL approach outperformed the state of the art results in all three tasks. This opens a new direction to integrate DL technology more efficiently in the legal domain.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Natural Language Processing for the Legal Domain: A Survey of Tasks, Datasets, Models, and Challengescited by 42
- 2022Extractive Summarization of Legal Decisions using Multi-task Learning and Maximal Marginal Relevancecited by 9
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Legal Summarization: Challenges and Future Directionscited by 6
- 2023Assisting Human Decisions in Document Matchingcited by 3
- 2025Summarisation of German Judgments in conjunction with a Class-based Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Towards Explainable Adjudicative Variance: Quantifying Judicial Discretion via Gated Multi-Task Learningcited by 0
- 2026Towards Explainable Adjudicative Variance: Quantifying Judicial Discretion via Gated Multi-Task Learning25 Jun 2026
- 2025Summarisation of German Judgments in conjunction with a Class-based Evaluation9 May 2025
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Legal Summarization: Challenges and Future Directions29 Jan 2025
- 2024Natural Language Processing for the Legal Domain: A Survey of Tasks, Datasets, Models, and Challenges25 Oct 2024
- 2023Assisting Human Decisions in Document Matching16 Feb 2023
- 2022Extractive Summarization of Legal Decisions using Multi-task Learning and Maximal Marginal Relevance22 Oct 2022