mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fault Tolerance in Iterative-Convergent Machine Learning

arXiv 1810.07354 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2018cs.LG stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) training algorithms often possess an inherent self-correcting behavior due to their iterative-convergent nature. Recent systems exploit this property to achieve adaptability and efficiency in unreliable computing environments by relaxing the consistency of execution and allowing calculation errors to be self-corrected during training. However, the behavior of such systems are only well understood for specific types of calculation errors, such as those caused by staleness, reduced precision, or asynchronicity, and for specific types of training algorithms, such as stochastic gradient descent. In this paper, we develop a general framework to quantify the effects of calculation errors on iterative-convergent algorithms and use this framework to design new strategies for checkpoint-based fault tolerance. Our framework yields a worst-case upper bound on the iteration cost of arbitrary perturbations to model parameters during training. Our system, SCAR, employs strategies which reduce the iteration cost upper bound due to perturbations incurred when recovering from checkpoints. We show that SCAR can reduce the iteration cost of partial failures by 78% - 95% when compared with traditional checkpoint-based fault tolerance across a variety of ML models and training algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2020: 1; 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2.

7 papers.