mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Overview of CAIL2018: Legal Judgment Prediction Competition

arXiv 1810.05851 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2018cs.AIcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we give an overview of the Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) competition at Chinese AI and Law challenge (CAIL2018). This competition focuses on LJP which aims to predict the judgment results according to the given facts. Specifically, in CAIL2018 , we proposed three subtasks of LJP for the contestants, i.e., predicting relevant law articles, charges and prison terms given the fact descriptions. CAIL2018 has attracted several hundreds participants (601 teams, 1, 144 contestants from 269 organizations). In this paper, we provide a detailed overview of the task definition, related works, outstanding methods and competition results in CAIL2018.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 6; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: