mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Does Haze Removal Help CNN-based Image Classification?

arXiv 1810.05716 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2018cs.CVcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hazy images are common in real scenarios and many dehazing methods have been developed to automatically remove the haze from images. Typically, the goal of image dehazing is to produce clearer images from which human vision can better identify the object and structural details present in the images. When the ground-truth haze-free image is available for a hazy image, quantitative evaluation of image dehazing is usually based on objective metrics, such as Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Structural Similarity (SSIM). However, in many applications, large-scale images are collected not for visual examination by human. Instead, they are used for many high-level vision tasks, such as automatic classification, recognition and categorization. One fundamental problem here is whether various dehazing methods can produce clearer images that can help improve the performance of the high-level tasks. In this paper, we empirically study this problem in the important task of image classification by using both synthetic and real hazy image datasets. From the experimental results, we find that the existing image-dehazing methods cannot improve much the image-classification performance and sometimes even reduce the image-classification performance.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Lightweight Adaptive Feature De-drifting for Compressed Image Classificationcited by 46
  2. 2025UniRestore: Unified Perceptual and Task-Oriented Image Restoration Model Using Diffusion Priorcited by 42
  3. 2022FIFO: Learning Fog-invariant Features for Foggy Scene Segmentationcited by 31
  4. 2021Both Style and Fog Matter: Cumulative Domain Adaptation for Semantic Foggy Scene Understandingcited by 26
  5. 2024Task-driven Image Fusion with Learnable Fusion Losscited by 25
  6. 2021A Comprehensive Survey and Taxonomy on Single Image Dehazing Based on Deep Learningcited by 19
  7. 2021SAPNet: Segmentation-Aware Progressive Network for Perceptual Contrastive Derainingcited by 9
  8. 2023Is Underwater Image Enhancement All Object Detectors Need?cited by 9
  9. 2025Exploiting Diffusion Prior for Task-driven Image Restorationcited by 8
  10. 2022FogAdapt: Self-Supervised Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation of Foggy Imagescited by 7
  11. 2025Deep Unfolding Multi-modal Image Fusion Network via Attribution Analysiscited by 7
  12. 2021Task-Driven Deep Image Enhancement Network for Autonomous Driving in Bad Weathercited by 6
8 more
  1. 2024Boosting Visual Recognition in Real-world Degradations via Unsupervised Feature Enhancement Module with Deep Channel Priorcited by 5
  2. 2022Dynamic Test-Time Augmentation via Differentiable Functionscited by 4
  3. 2026Self-Evolving Agentic Image Restoration via Deliberate Planning and Intuitive Executioncited by 4
  4. 2024Unsupervised Variational Translator for Bridging Image Restoration and High-Level Vision Taskscited by 3
  5. 2025Bridging Scales in Map Generation: A scale-aware cascaded generative mapping framework for seamless and consistent multi-scale cartographic representationcited by 3
  6. 2026TaskTok: Delving into Task Tokens for Task-driven Image Restorationcited by 3
  7. 2023DA-RAW: Domain Adaptive Object Detection for Real-World Adverse Weather Conditionscited by 0
  8. 2026Noise-Free One-Step LoRA for Task-Driven Image Restoration with Diffusion Priorscited by 0