mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A maximum-mean-discrepancy goodness-of-fit test for censored data

arXiv 1810.04286 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2018stat.MEcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a kernel-based goodness-of-fit test for censored data, where observations may be missing in random time intervals: a common occurrence in clinical trials and industrial life-testing. The test statistic is straightforward to compute, as is the test threshold, and we establish consistency under the null. Unlike earlier approaches such as the Log-rank test, we make no assumptions as to how the data distribution might differ from the null, and our test has power against a very rich class of alternatives. In experiments, our test outperforms competing approaches for periodic and Weibull hazard functions (where risks are time dependent), and does not show the failure modes of tests that rely on user-defined features. Moreover, in cases where classical tests are provably most powerful, our test performs almost as well, while being more general.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

9 papers.