The Long Road to Computational Location Privacy: A Survey
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The widespread adoption of continuously connected smartphones and tablets developed the usage of mobile applications, among which many use location to provide geolocated services. These services provide new prospects for users: getting directions to work in the morning, leaving a check-in at a restaurant at noon and checking next day's weather in the evening are possible right from any mobile device embedding a GPS chip. In these location-based applications, the user's location is sent to a server, which uses them to provide contextual and personalised answers. However, nothing prevents the latter from gathering, analysing and possibly sharing the collected information, which opens the door to many privacy threats. Indeed, mobility data can reveal sensitive information about users, among which one's home, work place or even religious and political preferences. For this reason, many privacy-preserving mechanisms have been proposed these last years to enhance location privacy while using geolocated services. This article surveys and organises contributions in this area from classical building blocks to the most recent developments of privacy threats and location privacy-preserving mechanisms. We divide the protection mechanisms between online and offline use cases, and organise them into six categories depending on the nature of their algorithm. Moreover, this article surveys the evaluation metrics used to assess protection mechanisms in terms of privacy, utility and performance. Finally, open challenges and new directions to address the problem of computational location privacy are pointed out and discussed.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2024SoK: Can Trajectory Generation Combine Privacy and Utility?cited by 6
- 2021Learning interaction rules from multi-animal trajectories via augmented behavioral modelscited by 5
- 2022Privacy-Aware Adversarial Network in Human Mobility Predictioncited by 2
- 2023Preserving Privacy in GANs Against Membership Inference Attackcited by 2
- 2026A Dual Perspective on Synthetic Trajectory Generators: Utility Framework and Privacy Vulnerabilitiescited by 1
- 2024Synthetic Trajectory Generation Through Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2024Demystifying Trajectory Recovery From Ash: An Open-Source Evaluation and Enhancementcited by 0
- 2025"I'm not for sale" -- Perceptions and limited awareness of privacy risks by digital natives about location datacited by 0
- 2025What is the Cost of Differential Privacy for Deep Learning-Based Trajectory Generation?cited by 0
- 2026Agentic AI-Powered Re-Identification: An Emerging, Scalable Threat to Mobility Microdata Privacycited by 0
- 2026Agentic AI-Powered Re-Identification: An Emerging, Scalable Threat to Mobility Microdata Privacy26 Jun 2026
- 2026A Dual Perspective on Synthetic Trajectory Generators: Utility Framework and Privacy Vulnerabilities21 Apr 2026
- 2025What is the Cost of Differential Privacy for Deep Learning-Based Trajectory Generation?11 Jun 2025
- 2025"I'm not for sale" -- Perceptions and limited awareness of privacy risks by digital natives about location data17 Feb 2025
- 2024Demystifying Trajectory Recovery From Ash: An Open-Source Evaluation and Enhancement23 Sep 2024
- 2024Synthetic Trajectory Generation Through Convolutional Neural Networks24 Jul 2024
- 2024SoK: Can Trajectory Generation Combine Privacy and Utility?12 Mar 2024
- 2023Preserving Privacy in GANs Against Membership Inference Attack6 Nov 2023
- 2022Privacy-Aware Adversarial Network in Human Mobility Prediction9 Aug 2022
- 2021Learning interaction rules from multi-animal trajectories via augmented behavioral models12 Jul 2021