Sparse Regression with Multi-type Regularized Feature Modeling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Within the statistical and machine learning literature, regularization techniques are often used to construct sparse (predictive) models. Most regularization strategies only work for data where all predictors are treated identically, such as Lasso regression for (continuous) predictors treated as linear effects. However, many predictive problems involve different types of predictors and require a tailored regularization term. We propose a multi-type Lasso penalty that acts on the objective function as a sum of subpenalties, one for each type of predictor. As such, we allow for predictor selection and level fusion within a predictor in a data-driven way, simultaneous with the parameter estimation process. We develop a new estimation strategy for convex predictive models with this multi-type penalty. Using the theory of proximal operators, our estimation procedure is computationally efficient, partitioning the overall optimization problem into easier to solve subproblems, specific for each predictor type and its associated penalty. Earlier research applies approximations to non-differentiable penalties to solve the optimization problem. The proposed SMuRF algorithm removes the need for approximations and achieves a higher accuracy and computational efficiency. This is demonstrated with an extensive simulation study and the analysis of a case-study on insurance pricing analytics.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Smoothness and monotonicity constraints for neural networks using ICEnetcited by 2
- 2022Churn modeling of life insurance policies via statistical and machine learning methods -- Analysis of important featurescited by 1
- 2024Classification problem in liability insurance using machine learning models: a comparative studycited by 0
- 2025Nash: Neural Adaptive Shrinkage for Structured High-Dimensional Regressioncited by 0
- 2025Nash: Neural Adaptive Shrinkage for Structured High-Dimensional Regression16 May 2025
- 2024Classification problem in liability insurance using machine learning models: a comparative study1 Nov 2024
- 2023Smoothness and monotonicity constraints for neural networks using ICEnet15 May 2023
- 2022Churn modeling of life insurance policies via statistical and machine learning methods -- Analysis of important features18 Feb 2022