mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Relative Saliency and Ranking: Models, Metrics, Data, and Benchmarks

arXiv 1810.02426 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2018cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Salient object detection is a problem that has been considered in detail and textcolorblackmany solutions have been proposed. In this paper, we argue that work to date has addressed a problem that is relatively ill-posed. Specifically, there is not universal agreement about what constitutes a salient object when multiple observers are queried. This implies that some objects are more likely to be judged salient than others, and implies a relative rank exists on salient objects. Initially, we present a novel deep learning solution based on a hierarchical representation of relative saliency and stage-wise refinement. Further to this, we present data, analysis and baseline benchmark results towards addressing the problem of salient object ranking. Methods for deriving suitable ranked salient object instances are presented, along with metrics suitable to measuring algorithm performance. In addition, we show how a derived dataset can be successively refined to provide cleaned results that correlate well with pristine ground truth in its characteristics and value for training and testing models. Finally, we provide a comparison among prevailing algorithms that address salient object ranking or detection to establish initial baselines providing a basis for comparison with future efforts addressing this problem. textcolorblackThe source code and data are publicly available via our project page: textrmhrefhttps://ryersonvisionlab.github.io/cocosalrank.htmlryersonvisionlab.github.io/cocosalrank

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

9 papers.