mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Thompson Sampling Algorithms for Cascading Bandits

arXiv 1810.01187 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2018cs.LG stat.MLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Motivated by the pressing need for efficient optimization in online recommender systems, we revisit the cascading bandit model proposed by Kveton et al. (2015). While Thompson sampling (TS) algorithms have been shown to be empirically superior to Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) algorithms for cascading bandits, theoretical guarantees are only known for the latter. In this paper, we first provide a problem-dependent upper bound on the regret of a TS algorithm with Beta-Bernoulli updates; this upper bound is tighter than a recent derivation under a more general setting by Huyuk and Tekin (2019). Next, we design and analyze another TS algorithm with Gaussian updates, TS-Cascade. TS-Cascade achieves the state-of-the-art regret bound for cascading bandits. Complementarily, we consider a linear generalization of the cascading bandit model, which allows efficient learning in large cascading bandit problem instances. We introduce and analyze a TS algorithm, which enjoys a regret bound that depends on the dimension of the linear model but not the number of items. Finally, by using information-theoretic techniques and judiciously constructing cascading bandit instances, we derive a nearly matching regret lower bound for the standard model. Our paper establishes the first theoretical guarantees on TS algorithms for stochastic combinatorial bandit problem model with partial feedback. Numerical experiments demonstrate the superiority of the proposed TS algorithms compared to existing UCB-based ones.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 5; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort: