Second-order Guarantees of Distributed Gradient Algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider distributed smooth nonconvex unconstrained optimization over networks, modeled as a connected graph. We examine the behavior of distributed gradient-based algorithms near strict saddle points. Specifically, we establish that (i) the renowned Distributed Gradient Descent (DGD) algorithm likely converges to a neighborhood of a Second-order Stationary (SoS) solution; and (ii) the more recent class of distributed algorithms based on gradient tracking--implementable also over digraphs--likely converges to exact SoS solutions, thus avoiding (strict) saddle-points. Furthermore, new convergence rate results to first-order critical points is established for the latter class of algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021Decentralized Optimization Over the Stiefel Manifold by an Approximate Augmented Lagrangian Functioncited by 11
- 2022Decentralized Nonconvex Optimization with Guaranteed Privacy and Accuracycited by 10
- 2024Quantization Avoids Saddle Points in Distributed Optimizationcited by 2
- 2021Distributed Sparse Regression via Penalizationcited by 1
- 2023Decentralized Weakly Convex Optimization Over the Stiefel Manifoldcited by 1
- 2024Quantization Avoids Saddle Points in Distributed Optimization15 Mar 2024
- 2023Decentralized Weakly Convex Optimization Over the Stiefel Manifold31 Mar 2023
- 2022Decentralized Nonconvex Optimization with Guaranteed Privacy and Accuracy14 Dec 2022
- 2021Decentralized Optimization Over the Stiefel Manifold by an Approximate Augmented Lagrangian Function30 Dec 2021
- 2021Distributed Sparse Regression via Penalization12 Nov 2021