mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A proof that deep artificial neural networks overcome the curse of dimensionality in the numerical approximation of Kolmogorov partial differential equations with constant diffusion and nonlinear drift coefficients

arXiv 1809.07321 ↗First posted 19 Sep 2018math.NA cs.LG cs.NAcited by 31

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years deep artificial neural networks (DNNs) have been successfully employed in numerical simulations for a multitude of computational problems including, for example, object and face recognition, natural language processing, fraud detection, computational advertisement, and numerical approximations of partial differential equations (PDEs). These numerical simulations indicate that DNNs seem to possess the fundamental flexibility to overcome the curse of dimensionality in the sense that the number of real parameters used to describe the DNN grows at most polynomially in both the reciprocal of the prescribed approximation accuracy varepsilon > 0 and the dimension d ∈ mathbbN of the function which the DNN aims to approximate in such computational problems. There is also a large number of rigorous mathematical approximation results for artificial neural networks in the scientific literature but there are only a few special situations where results in the literature can rigorously justify the success of DNNs in high-dimensional function approximation. The key contribution of this paper is to reveal that DNNs do overcome the curse of dimensionality in the numerical approximation of Kolmogorov PDEs with constant diffusion and nonlinear drift coefficients. We prove that the number of parameters used to describe the employed DNN grows at most polynomially in both the PDE dimension d ∈ mathbbN and the reciprocal of the prescribed approximation accuracy varepsilon > 0 . A crucial ingredient in our proof is the fact that the artificial neural network used to approximate the solution of the PDE is indeed a deep artificial neural network with a large number of hidden layers.

Key facts. Cited by 31 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 8; 2022: 8; 2023: 3; 2024: 6; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

31 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learningcited by 65
  2. 2022Deep Learning Methods for Partial Differential Equations and Related Parameter Identification Problemscited by 34
  3. 2021Interpolating between BSDEs and PINNs: deep learning for elliptic and parabolic boundary value problemscited by 21
  4. 2023An Extreme Learning Machine-Based Method for Computational PDEs in Higher Dimensionscited by 21
  5. 2021Parametric Complexity Bounds for Approximating PDEs with Neural Networkscited by 18
  6. 2021Physics-enhanced deep surrogates for partial differential equationscited by 18
  7. 2021Solving high-dimensional parabolic PDEs using the tensor train formatcited by 17
  8. 2021Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Uncertainty Quantification in Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 16
  9. 2022Neural Network Approximations of PDEs Beyond Linearity: A Representational Perspectivecited by 15
  10. 2021Error Estimates for the Deep Ritz Method with Boundary Penaltycited by 14
  11. 2022Robust SDE-Based Variational Formulations for Solving Linear PDEs via Deep Learningcited by 13
  12. 2024Full error analysis of the random deep splitting method for nonlinear parabolic PDEs and PIDEscited by 12
19 more
  1. 2022Convergence of a robust deep FBSDE method for stochastic controlcited by 11
  2. 2022Deep neural network expressivity for optimal stopping problemscited by 9
  3. 2025Universal Approximation Theorem of Deep Q-Networkscited by 6
  4. 2023Residual Multi-Fidelity Neural Network Computingcited by 5
  5. 2025A brief review of the Deep BSDE method for solving high-dimensional partial differential equationscited by 5
  6. 2021Deep neural network surrogates for non-smooth quantities of interest in shape uncertainty quantificationcited by 4
  7. 2024FBSJNN: A Theoretically Interpretable and Efficiently Deep Learning method for Solving Partial Integro-Differential Equationscited by 4
  8. 2022The Deep Ritz Method for Parametric p-Dirichlet Problemscited by 3
  9. 2022From Monte Carlo to neural networks approximations of boundary value problemscited by 3
  10. 2024Multilevel Picard approximations and deep neural networks with ReLU, leaky ReLU, and softplus activation overcome the curse of dimensionality when approximating semilinear parabolic partial differential equations in Lp-sensecited by 3
  11. 2021Approximation properties of Residual Neural Networks for Kolmogorov PDEscited by 2
  12. 2023Approximating Langevin Monte Carlo with ResNet-like Neural Network architecturescited by 2
  13. 2024Enhancing Dynamic CT Image Reconstruction with Neural Fields and Optical Flowcited by 1
  14. 2024Polynomial-Augmented Neural Networks (PANNs) with Weak Orthogonality Constraints for Enhanced Function and PDE Approximationcited by 1
  15. 2025A deep solver for backward stochastic Volterra integral equationscited by 1
  16. 2024Dimension-independent learning rates for high-dimensional classification problemscited by 0
  17. 2026Global Convergence of DGM and PINN Algorithms for Solving Nonlinear PDEscited by 0
  18. 2026Walk-on-Spheres Monte Carlo and deep neural network approximations of elliptic PDEs with drift and killingcited by 0
  19. 2026Residual neural networks overcome the curse of dimensionality for semilinear heat equationscited by 0