Benchmarking five global optimization approaches for nano-optical shape optimization and parameter reconstruction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Numerical optimization is an important tool in the field of computational physics in general and in nano-optics in specific. It has attracted attention with the increase in complexity of structures that can be realized with nowadays nano-fabrication technologies for which a rational design is no longer feasible. Also, numerical resources are available to enable the computational photonic material design and to identify structures that meet predefined optical properties for specific applications. However, the optimization objective function is in general non-convex and its computation remains resource demanding such that the right choice for the optimization method is crucial to obtain excellent results. Here, we benchmark five global optimization methods for three typical nano-optical optimization problems: removeddownhill simplex optimization, the limited-memory Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (L-BFGS) algorithm, particle swarm optimization, differential evolution, and Bayesian optimization addedparticle swarm optimization, differential evolution, and Bayesian optimization as well as multi-start versions of downhill simplex optimization and the limited-memory Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (L-BFGS) algorithm. In the shown examples from the field of shape optimization and parameter reconstruction, Bayesian optimization, mainly known from machine learning applications, obtains significantly better results in a fraction of the run times of the other optimization methods.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2023A neural operator-based surrogate solver for free-form electromagnetic inverse designcited by 19
- 2021Bayesian optimization with improved scalability and derivative information for efficient design of nanophotonic structurescited by 3
- 2022Bayesian Target-Vector Optimization for Efficient Parameter Reconstructioncited by 1
- 2021A Framework for Discovering Optimal Solutions in Photonic Inverse Designcited by 0
- 2021Recent advances in Bayesian optimization with applications to parameter reconstruction in optical nano-metrologycited by 0
- 2023Impact Study of Numerical Discretization Accuracy on Parameter Reconstructions and Model Parameter Distributionscited by 0
- 2026Gradient-Informed Bayesian and Interior Point Optimization for Efficient Inverse Design in Nanophotonicscited by 0
- 2026When Every Simulation Counts: Value-Based Reinforcement Learning for Accelerated Photonics Inverse Designcited by 0
- 2026When Every Simulation Counts: Value-Based Reinforcement Learning for Accelerated Photonics Inverse Design26 Jul 2026
- 2026Gradient-Informed Bayesian and Interior Point Optimization for Efficient Inverse Design in Nanophotonics20 Feb 2026
- 2023Impact Study of Numerical Discretization Accuracy on Parameter Reconstructions and Model Parameter Distributions4 May 2023
- 2023A neural operator-based surrogate solver for free-form electromagnetic inverse design4 Feb 2023
- 2022Bayesian Target-Vector Optimization for Efficient Parameter Reconstruction23 Feb 2022
- 2021Recent advances in Bayesian optimization with applications to parameter reconstruction in optical nano-metrology12 Jul 2021
- 2021A Framework for Discovering Optimal Solutions in Photonic Inverse Design3 Jun 2021
- 2021Bayesian optimization with improved scalability and derivative information for efficient design of nanophotonic structures8 Jan 2021