Exploring the Vulnerability of Single Shot Module in Object Detectors via Imperceptible Background Patches
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent works succeeded to generate adversarial perturbations on the entire image or the object of interests to corrupt CNN based object detectors. In this paper, we focus on exploring the vulnerability of the Single Shot Module (SSM) commonly used in recent object detectors, by adding small perturbations to patches in the background outside the object. The SSM is referred to the Region Proposal Network used in a two-stage object detector or the single-stage object detector itself. The SSM is typically a fully convolutional neural network which generates output in a single forward pass. Due to the excessive convolutions used in SSM, the actual receptive field is larger than the object itself. As such, we propose a novel method to corrupt object detectors by generating imperceptible patches only in the background. Our method can find a few background patches for perturbation, which can effectively decrease true positives and dramatically increase false positives. Efficacy is demonstrated on 5 two-stage object detectors and 8 single-stage object detectors on the MS COCO 2014 dataset. Results indicate that perturbations with small distortions outside the bounding box of object region can still severely damage the detection performance.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3.
12 papers.
- 2021Segment and Complete: Defending Object Detectors against Adversarial Patch Attacks with Robust Patch Detectioncited by 67
- 2021Robust and Accurate Object Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 42
- 2021The SARAS Endoscopic Surgeon Action Detection (ESAD) dataset: Challenges and methodscited by 37
- 2021Adversarial Feature Augmentation and Normalization for Visual Recognitioncited by 11
- 2023DomainForensics: Exposing Face Forgery across Domains via Bi-directional Adaptationcited by 8
- 2024A Survey and Evaluation of Adversarial Attacks for Object Detectioncited by 7
- 2021Simple Transparent Adversarial Examplescited by 6
- 2024Embodied Active Defense: Leveraging Recurrent Feedback to Counter Adversarial Patchescited by 4
- 2024EVD4UAV: An Altitude-Sensitive Benchmark to Evade Vehicle Detection in UAVcited by 2
- 2022SSMI: How to Make Objects of Interest Disappear without Accessing Object Detectors?cited by 1
- 2021Physical world assistive signals for deep neural network classifiers -- neither defense nor attackcited by 0
- 2023Towards Improving Robustness Against Common Corruptions in Object Detectors Using Adversarial Contrastive Learningcited by 0
- 2024A Survey and Evaluation of Adversarial Attacks for Object Detection4 Aug 2024
- 2024Embodied Active Defense: Leveraging Recurrent Feedback to Counter Adversarial Patches31 Mar 2024
- 2024EVD4UAV: An Altitude-Sensitive Benchmark to Evade Vehicle Detection in UAV8 Mar 2024
- 2023DomainForensics: Exposing Face Forgery across Domains via Bi-directional Adaptation17 Dec 2023
- 2023Towards Improving Robustness Against Common Corruptions in Object Detectors Using Adversarial Contrastive Learning14 Nov 2023
- 2022SSMI: How to Make Objects of Interest Disappear without Accessing Object Detectors?22 Jun 2022
- 2021Segment and Complete: Defending Object Detectors against Adversarial Patch Attacks with Robust Patch Detection8 Dec 2021
- 2021Simple Transparent Adversarial Examples20 May 2021
- 2021Physical world assistive signals for deep neural network classifiers -- neither defense nor attack3 May 2021
- 2021The SARAS Endoscopic Surgeon Action Detection (ESAD) dataset: Challenges and methods7 Apr 2021
- 2021Robust and Accurate Object Detection via Adversarial Learning23 Mar 2021
- 2021Adversarial Feature Augmentation and Normalization for Visual Recognition22 Mar 2021